More From The Department of Injustice
EDITORIAL: Scandal at Justice: Enabling vote fraud
Whistleblower blocks epidemic of dead voters
The Washington Times
September 3, 2010
The dead voters may be forced back into their graves. The biggest scandal emerging from the infamous New Black Panther voter- intimidation case didn’t even involve the Black Panthers. Instead, it came when whistleblowing attorney J. Christian Adams told the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights that top Justice Department official Julie Fernandes had openly refused to enforce laws that require states to remove ineligible names – dead people, felons, people who have moved – from voter rolls.
“We have no interest in enforcing this provision of the law,” Ms. Fernandes reportedly told a roomful of employees of the department’s Voting Section in November. “It has nothing to do with increasing turnout, and we are just not going to do it.”
Now comes Mr. Adams to show this wasn’t idle talk. As early as today, 16 states will start receiving official “notice letters” from him warning of coming private-action lawsuits to compel them to enforce these particular provisions of the law. This appears to mean that the Justice Department is refusing to make states comply with federal voter-verification laws – which is why the task will fall to Mr. Adams, helping represent private citizens whose legal votes otherwise would be diluted in value by fraudulent votes.
The evidence adduced by Mr. Adams, who resigned in protest from the Obama Justice Department, is so stark as to beg the question of how the department could miss it other than by deliberately, lawlessly ignoring it. It is unclear why Ms. Fernandes felt compelled to make her turnout statement at all, unless it was to push back against staff attorneys who wanted to do their jobs according to the laws of the land.
Mr. Adams’ notice letters report that South Dakota, for example, has 17 counties with more registered voters than there are citizens of voting age living there. Mississippi has 17 such counties. Alabama has seven, and Indiana, Kentucky and Texas have 12 each. Most of the states threatened with suits have reported no cleaning of their voter lists for years. Multiple press accounts in Tennessee show a serious problem with convicted felons and illegal immigrants being registered and sometimes voting.
Along those lines, Mr. Adams’ missives also include Freedom of Information Act requests for the lists of federal felony convictions that the federal “motor voter” law requires the Justice Department to provide to election officials in each state. The direct intent of the requirement is to enable states that ban felon voting to scrub those names from their registration lists. The implication from Mr. Adams is that the Justice Department is ignoring that part of the law, too.
This developing scandal of mystery voters and dead voters resurrects the story about the Justice Department’s own website showing more substantial efforts to help felons reacquire voting privileges – even though the department has no statutory authority to do so – than to help ensure the opportunity for military personnel overseas to have their votes cast and counted on time.
From top to bottom, the Justice Department appears to be rigging voting-law enforcement in favor of interest groups usually seen to favor Democratic candidates. If so, the department is aiding and abetting vote fraud. Either way, this a major scandal that shouldn’t be buried
Political stars born of Arizona law
Political stars born of Arizona law
Immigration takes larger role in races across U.S.
By Stephen Dinan
The Washington Times
September 6, 2010
Despite being waylaid by the courts, Arizona’s immigration law is still growing as a powerful political force, shaping elections across the country and creating a new generation of campaign stars in and out of the state.
The law’s sponsor has become a sought-after kingmaker in Republican primaries, one of the chief legal advisers is running for statewide office in Kansas, and several Arizona sheriffs backing the law have earned substantial television airtime. Maybe the most obvious example is Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, who has used the law to take control of her race and all but guarantee she’ll win in November.
“The truth is, probably 80 to 90 percent of Americans support this bill,” said state Sen. Russell Pearce, the law’s chief sponsor, who has been at the forefront of Arizona’s immigration fights for years but said this battle has pushed his profile to new heights and has staying power. “I suspect this will be an issue through the presidential election in 2012. It’s not going to go away.”
Mr. Pearce wrote Senate Bill 1070, which became the basis for the law. It was amended later by another law and then, at the end of July, altered by a federal court, which blocked key provisions.
Among the halted parts were requirements that all immigrants carry proof of legal residence and that police check the legal status of those they encounter during routine enforcement whom they suspect of being in the country illegally.
Those opposed to the law mobilized quickly and called for boycotts of Arizona, and some major cities have announced they are taking part in the boycotts. Even some Major League Baseball players have said next year’s all-star game should be moved from Phoenix to protest the law.
But after years of massive illegal immigration, the law struck a chord with voters nationwide, and it joins a small set of state laws throughout the years that have gained instant nationwide recognition.
“When I speak anywhere and I start talking about the Arizona law, there is an automatic and immediate reaction,” said former Rep. Tom Tancredo, who helped force the immigration issue on the 2008 presidential campaign agenda and is a third-party candidate for governor in Colorado. “Now how many times has that happened in our nation’s history?”
Mr. Tancredo said there’s not a location in the country where he couldn’t go to campaign in support of S.B. 1070, and that’s backed up by polls in states as diverse as Michigan and New Mexico that have found majority support for enacting similar laws.
Lawmakers in some states are working on that. Mr. Pearce said he has fielded inquiries from officials in Colorado, Tennessee, Utah, Pennsylvania and Maryland.
Democrat’s talking points-as(s)inine conclusions
Often times a picture tells the entire story And here is the rest of it.
We Won’t Let Terrorism Stop Us From Appeasing the Terrorists
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu arrived in Washington D.C. over the bodies of four of his citizens and one unborn child, murdered by Islamic terrorists. The media had spent a busy two days worrying that the murders might in some way interrupt the latest phase of the tragic farce euphemistically referred to as, “The Peace Process”. Luckily for the terrorists, who are the sole and only beneficiaries of these and all other negotiations, killing Israelis did not prevent the Israelis from showing up at the negotiating table anyway. The media however doesn’t think much of it, with multiple stories arguing that Netanyahu really doesn’t want peace. Time Magazine took it further with a cover story arguing that Israel Doesn’t Want Peace. Which is an inevitable assumption given that over the last two decades, Israel has turned over territory, weapons, houses, factories and cold hard cash to the terrorists. In exchange the terrorists have occasionally agreed to show up at the negotiating table, denounce Israel and demand more– in between calling for a Jihad. Clearly Israel doesn’t want peace.
Of course when it comes to walking across the bodies of his own dead citizens in order to shake the hand of a terrorist and a murderer, Netanyahu is a piker. Past Prime Ministers have shown up to negotiate after bus bombings with two digit casualties. They have sat across from Arafat, even as that greasy thug’s henchmen were busy firing their AK-47′s into the air in Ramallah to celebrate the last batch of arms and legs strewn across a shopping district by another martyr for Allah, Al Quds and Palestine. Perhaps when the terrorists manage to do more than kill four people, an unborn baby, wound a Rabbi, his wife and 12 year old girl– and the Prime Minister of Israel still shows up ready to give away the store to the terrorists, then the US government and the media will be convinced that Israel is absolutely serious about peace.
Not that there’s anything to actually negotiate. Abbas is an unelected dictator being propped up by the Obama Administration, and doesn’t represent anyone. Also Abbas has announced that he will make no concessions to Israel whatsoever. He also announced that he absolutely refuses to recognize Israel. Naturally you won’t find mention of this in the media. Certainly not in Time Magazine. There won’t be any covers reading, “Why the Terrorists Don’t Want Peace”, just as you won’t see any Time covers reading, “Why is Islam Bigoted?” The terrorists always get a pass. Their victims always get the shaft.
According to the media the biggest problem is Israeli towns (aka settlements) in areas that the terrorists want for themselves. One of those towns happens to be Jerusalem. If you believe the media, the obstacle to peace is not the murder of Jews by the terrorists, or that the leader of one of the terrorist factions has already announced that he is not willing to actually concede anything at the negotiations. No, the real problem is that there are Jews living in areas where they used to live before the armies of five Arab countries invaded their land, and ethnically cleansed the Jews from those areas.
In order to show good faith, Netanyahu agreed to freeze construction in those areas. What that means is Jewish residents can’t build an extension to their house and farmers can’t add a barn or a garage out back. People who have paid for a mortgage and began building a house for their kids have had to stop and wait. Because according to the terrorists, Obama and the media– their home is an obstacle to peace. After the latest terrorist attack, some of the residents have decided to take matters into their own hands and begin construction work on their own. The media has run sensational stories about this “illegal construction”, as if cement mixers and power drills, are more evil than drive by shootings and beating a man to death.
Lance Wolf beating caught on tape
In Jerusalem, two Arabs beat Lance Wolf, a 60 year old American from Seattle, to death. Near Hebron, Islamic terrorists murdered Yitzchak and Talia Imas, along with Avishai Shindler and Kokhava Even-Chaim. Rabbi Moshe Moreno was driving with his wife when terrorists opened fire with an assault rifle from a passing car. Their car overturned and the terrorists approached to finish them off, just as had been done to the Imas family. But the terrorists’ assault rifle jammed, Rabbi Moreno got his wife out of the car and took shelter behind a boulder. The media hasn’t even bothered to cover their near death escape. And in Washington D.C. everyone nods and gets down to the serious business of deciding how much the terrorists need to be appeased this time.
Obama described the killings as “senseless slaughter”. Given his loose attention to the words coming out of his mouth, it’s hard to say whether this was another malapropism or cynical pretense. Because everyone knows exactly what the “sense” behind the slaughter is. You can see it on Palestinian Arab TV, read it in the speeches of their leaders and the charters of their organizations. You can find it in the Koran and Abbas’ own veneration of terrorists as “martyrs”. The sense is simple enough. Kill the Jews. Kill the non-Muslims. Subjugate the rest.
That is the sense behind the slaughter. That was always the sense behind the slaughter.
On the 1st of August, the last month of her life, Talia Imas wrote a blog post in which she quoted the following;
In the Arabic language and Arab-Muslim mentality the word “peace” doesn’t exist in its European sense. There is peace among Muslims. There is peace when the infidels are subjugated and beg for mercy– then they can be granted peace. And there is Hudna, when the infidel enemy is strong and his destruction is postponed for a time. Hudna, the long-term truce, that is the best we can get– and only if we are strong.
A month before she and her husband were murdered, Talia Imas understood clearly why it would happen. Negotiating with Muslim terrorists is a sign of weakness. And weakness means the time is ripe for attack.
The Imas Family
In November 2009, the Israeli authorities took away Yitzchak Imas’ weapons permit, because of his participation in the Temple Institute, a peaceful organization that attempts to preserve the Jewish claim to the Temple Mount, the site of two temples, which Muslims hijacked in order to build their Dome of the Rock. Yitzchak led groups to the Temple Mount to remind them that the site is part of the Jewish cultural and religious heritage. An act that upset and enraged the Muslims. To the Israeli authorities that made him an extremist, as anyone who upsets Muslims is considered to be an extremist.
Yitzchak Imas was disarmed and left unable to defend his pregnant wife and the other passengers in his car. Because by upsetting Muslims he had demonstrated that he was an “extremists” and had to be disarmed. Similarly by upsetting the Muslim world, Israel has demonstrated to the international community of diplomats and appeasers that it is an “extremist state” and must be disarmed as well. The same cowardly Dhimmi psychology that cost Yitzchak Imas and his wife and their unborn child their lives– is driving Israel, and any country targeted by Muslims over the abyss.
Four days before her murder, Talia Imas recorded her thoughts on watching a documentary on the expulsion of Jews from Gaza, and on seeing the last remains of the Jewish towns and villages there.
“Except for mosques in which there are Islamic Universities, nothing is left. In place of all the towns, gardens, greenhouses, there is only sand, sand and sand. There is not even a sign of the life that was formerly there. Only at the end, the photographer reported that he had found the gray skeleton of a building, but he could not identify it. He sent me the photos and my breath stopped. It had been the synagogue in Neve Dekalim.
Job. This was the comparison I made. “The LORD has given and the LORD has taken away. Blessed be the name of the LORD.”
These are the words with which Bruriah also comforted her husband, R. Meir on the death of their sons. And the words with which Jews have so often accepted tragedy and loss.
That same day Yitzchak made plans to lead a group back to the Temple Mount in September. Four days later he and his wife were murdered. When the Muslim terrorists opened fire on his car and returned to finish them off, he could not fire a shot in self-defense. His weapons had been taken away.
Hillary Clinton described the Imas’ as “Lost”, but they were not lost. They were found. They had come out of the Soviet Union and the dark heart of Communism where religion was forbidden, faith was a crime and Jewishness an offense– and found where they belonged. To the Clintons and Obamas, they are lost. To the left they were a blot on the land. To the media, they are a crime. And in Washington D.C., Obama and Clinton are working to turn over the home of their orphans to the terrorists who murdered their parents.
The Imas, who defied two totalitarian ideologies, Communism and Islamism, are not lost. They found the faith to defy evil. It is those who side with evil, like Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama, who are truly and irrevocably lost. It is the Hadash mob in Israel, the petty actors and writers waving their hateful little signs and vowing a boycott in the name of a socialist solidarity with their Arab Marxist colleagues, now turned Islamist, that are lost. It is the politicians of the free world, in America and Europe, Australia, Israel, Canada and anywhere in the world who bow to evil– who are lost. And if they are allowed to remain in power, those countries that they rule over will be lost too.
And now the “Lost” once again head off to more talks. Talks with terrorists whose leader has already announced that he make no concessions and that he will not even recognize Israel. And these are the “moderate” terrorists. The ones supported by American money and weapons, and Israeli electricity and tax revenues.
“We won’t let Terrorism stop us from appeasing the Terrorists”, proclaim our leaders. They may kill as many of us as they like, and we will take their side in every dispute. We will give them land and money. We will let them build a mosque at Ground Zero. We will betray our own, let them divide and conquer us, community by community, state by state and nation by nation. We will denounce anyone who resists as extremists. We will fight with our very last breath for the right to go on surrendering to terrorists. We will go on appeasing them until we are all dead or slaves. Then they will finally know that we were the “good ones”, the tolerant and enlightened people. Good enough. Good as dead.
Which of these is not like the others?
The Peace Process is the process of Islam. The process by which Islamic supremacy is achieved through guile. The Arabic word for peace is Salaam or السلام . The Hadiths describe Salaam as one of the six rights of a Muslim. As-Salaam is also the name of Allah, the Muslim deity. Non-Muslims cannot be granted Salaam, unless they Taslim, submit to Muslims and their deity. To ask Muslims for peace, is to offer to submit to them. Is it any wonder if they take you at your word?
The Peace Process is only a fingernail on the gnarled hand of Islam reaching out for the world. Nations like Israeli, India and Thailand which have large Muslim minorities and share borders with Muslim countries are on the frontier, the firing line. But the invasion force has not stopped there. It is in Europe and Australia. It is in America and Canada. It is here right now. And those who insist that they will not allow terrorism to stop them from appeasing the terrorists, are worse than the terrorists. Because the only thing worse than a murderer, is the man who is paid to stop him, but lets him do his bloody work instead. In the name of peace. In the name of Islam.
Al-Qaeda camp teaches boys as young as five to bomb and kill
Nick Owens
Boys as young as five can barely hold up the machine guns and pistols in their hands as they take aim at imaginary targets in the Pakistan desert.
But this is no sick game, it is their first step along the way to becoming al-Qaeda terrorists as they are taught about military combat and how to launch suicide missions.
At hidden camps terrorist chiefs also use toys to teach the boys how they can blow up buildings and mount roadside bomb attacks.
One chilling image from a video filmed inside one camp shows children, barely old enough to be at school, crowding around a toy police car wired up to a bomb. And they all cheer as a baby-faced bomber presses a button on a mobile phone which blasts the car to pieces.
Militants are training hundreds of youngsters to become killers in the camp based in North Waziristan.
They are then battle-hardened on missions against coalition troops across the border in Afghanistan.
British commanders say Taliban fighters are increasingly using children like these as suicide bombers. They are also used as human shields during fire-fights.
The recruits are being trained by the al-Qaeda-linked East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM).
The terror group has cells in Afghanistan and Pakistan and have been responsible for more than 200 acts of terrorism across the globe in the last 20 years.
Now they are using madrassas – religious Islamic schools – as a cover to groom a new army of bombers.
Video footage passed to the Sunday Mirror shows the children learning to fire weapons, undergoing religious instruction and taking part in physical training. Dressed in camouflage uniform, the bewildered youngsters are made to stand in line before being handed AK-47 rifles.
SM Terror Tots 450 (Pic:SM)
The children come from families within the Turkic ethnic group of Uyghur people – Chinese Muslims who have fled and settled in Pakistan Afghanistan and Kazakhstan.
Many have been signed up to the ETIM as one aim of the terror group is to make China’s Xinjiang province – where 80 per cent of the population are Uyghur people – independent. Their mission has led already to a series of attacks against China.
Terrorism expert Neil Doyle said the video, which is being released as part of a Jihad recruitment drive, was “a shocking example of the sick tactics al-Qaeda use.”
It appears on a website called Revolution Muslim, which is run in the name of hate preachers Anjem Choudary, Omar Bakri Mohammad and Abdullah el-Faisal, all of whom have close links to the UK.
nick.owens@sundaymirror.co.uk
Read more: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/08/29/al-qaeda-camp-teaches-boys-as-young-as-five-to-bomb-and-kill-115875-22520944/#ixzz0ypexwwfb
For the Jews in Israel, Money Trumps All?
I know it’s commonplace to read in the latest issue of Time or Newsweek that Obama is a god, that Islamophobic Americans are collectively prejudiced against Muslims, that the response after 9/11 was overblown and unnecessary (over 30 subsequent terrorist plots have been foiled, and, for some reason, renditions, tribunals, Guantanamo, Predators, intercepts, etc., have all been embraced by the Obama administration), but the recent Time piece on Israel by a Karl Vick is probably the most anti-Semitic essay I have ever read in a mainstream publication. Among Vick’s interviewees is Heli Itach, a modern-day Shylock who brags about the money to be made selling condos in Jerusalem (“‘Even when the Qassams fell, we continued to sell!’ says Heli Itach, slapping a palm on the office desk”). The accompanying photo shows carefree Israelis on the beach.
In fact, Vick argues, the Jews are so obsessed with making money that they don’t much care what happens in the future: “The truth is, Israelis are no longer preoccupied with the matter. They’re otherwise engaged; they’re making money; they’re enjoying the rays of late summer. A watching world may still define their country by the blood feud with the Arabs whose families used to live on this land and whether that conflict can be negotiated away, but Israelis say they have moved on.”
You see, Vick has discovered that the rather worldly Israelis, after stealing their land from Arabs, don’t much care for the hard negotiations that the Obama administration is now engaged in (“big elemental thoughts”), not when it is a matter of — yes, making money: “With souls a trifle weary of having to handle big elemental thoughts, the Israeli public prefers to explore such satisfactions as might be available from the private sphere, in a land first imagined as a utopia.”
And this near-suicidal, clueless Jewish preoccupation with money-grubbing has got Vick pretty upset: “But wait. Deep down (you can almost hear the outside world ask), don’t Israelis know that finding peace with the Palestinians is the only way to guarantee their happiness and prosperity? Well, not exactly.”
Finally, at the end of Vick’s piece, we discover why this is all so. Jews, we are told by interviewee “Eli,” can’t help it; it’s in their DNA. They like making money at the expense of everything else, from peace to justice: ”Another whack for the desk. ‘The people,’ Heli says, ‘don’t believe.’ Eli searches for a word. ‘People in Israel are indifferent,’ he decides. ‘They don’t care if there’s going to be war. They don’t care if there’s going to be peace. They don’t care. They live in the day.’”
Gordon Brown on the ‘Non-Existent’ Global Government
Gordon Brown is talking about what many people are calling global governance, or when they aren’t mincing words, global government. Similar calls are made from Council on Foreign Relations members like Fareed Zakaria, a regular contributor for propaganda clearing house “Newsweek” in articles like “Writing the Rules for a New World.”
Global problems, they argue, need global solutions. Global problems like the H1N1 Swine Flu pandemic, which later turned out to be over-hyped by industry insiders. Global problems like the current economic melt down perpetrated by the very financial institutions and regulatory organizations seeking additional authority and consolidation with even less oversight than before. Global problems like “terrorism” and “conflict” that the globalists are firmly, undoubtedly behind. Indeed, they are proposing global government to solve these global problems, they themselves are making.
These are immensely powerful people, the remnants of the European empires and the by-product of America’s “Manifest Destiny” seeking global consolidation through these “global institutions”.’
The Extraordinary Tale of Red Rain, Comets and Extraterrestrials
For years, claims have circulated that red rain which fell in India in 2001, contained cells unlike any found on Earth. Now new evidence that these cells can reproduce is about to set the debate alive.
Panspermia is the idea that life exists throughout the universe in comets, asteroids and interstellar dust clouds and that life of Earth was seeded from one or more of these sources. Panspermia holds that we are all extraterrestrials.’
Obama: Muslim Missionary? (Part 4)
Nine years ago this week, we began to chant: “We never will forget 9/11.”
Nine years later, I think too many of us have forgotten, especially those in the White House.
Islamic extremists murdered almost 3,000 innocent Americans on 9/11. Who would have believed that within a decade of that tragic event, we’d have a president who believes, according to his own 2009 Cairo confession and creed, that it is part of his “responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear”? Not to mention his mission to fight for the new mosque near ground zero! In Part 1 of this series, I began to demonstrate how President Barack Obama is using his special envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference, Rashad Hussain, to “deepen and expand the partnerships that the United States has pursued with Muslims around the world since President Obama’s speech in Cairo.”
In Part 2, I detailed President Obama’s real spiritual beliefs based upon a rare in-depth interview by a religious reporter for a major newspaper publication, including his beliefs about prayer, sin, heaven, the Bible and Jesus.
In Part 3, I explained how President Obama categorically has been prejudicial in his treatment against Christians and Christianity in comparison with Muslims and Islam.
In Part 4 here, I will not only expand on that case but also show how the Obama administration has changed course in just this past year regarding passing anti-First Amendment defamation of religion resolutions, exclusively benefiting Islam and its proliferation while again abandoning the principles in the U.S. Constitution.
In October 2009, the White House rightly opposed the Organization of the Islamic Conference’s (an intergovernmental body of 56 Muslim countries) push for the United Nations Human Rights Council to adopt a resolution that would broadly condemn the defamation of religion (or the defamation of Islam), because it would plunder Americans’ First Amendment right to freedom of speech.
Hypocritically, however, as The Heritage Foundation reported, at the same time that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was publicly repudiating that U.N. Human Rights Council resolution, on Oct. 2, 2009, the Obama administration’s “delegation to the 12th session of the council and OIC-member Egypt co-sponsored a resolution on freedom of opinion and expression that contains the essential elements of the resolutions on ‘defamation of religions’ that the U.S. opposed in the past.”
And just a few months ago, on June 23, that anti-First Amendment stand was reiterated. Hussain clearly explained the new leg of Obama’s Muslim mission at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars — information, by the way, that no mainstream news agency I could find even reported. Hussain said, “The OIC and the Obama administration will work together in the U.N. on the issue of defamation of religion, especially in Europe.” (Please read that again.)
Could it get any clearer? “Especially in Europe,” but not excluding America or wherever else Americans reside in the world!
And why should we not believe that Obama will overstep the Constitution again by handing over the administration of defamation of religion laws to global and international powers, when he recently reported Arizona immigration laws to the U.N. as an example of a human rights violation?
The fact is Obama’s Cairo pro-Muslim mission continues, and proof came again just last week. On the same day the president announced to the nation from the Oval Office that the combat mission in Iraq had ended, the Obama administration, unbeknownst to most of the country and the world, held a special workshop for 25-30 Muslim leaders from 20 national Islamic groups (under the leadership of the Coordinating Council of Muslim Organizations) to provide the groups “funding, government assistance and resources.”
At a time commemorating 9/11, when recent polls show that 70 percent of Americans are opposed to a ground zero mosque and 1 in 5 Americans believes President Obama is a Muslim, does he really expect that we will naively tolerate and approve of the Islamic bias in his presidential religious leadership and administration?
It’s time we heed the wisdom of our fourth president, James Madison, who said, “In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.”
(It’s because of our wayward and out-of-control federal government that I filmed my brand-new comical PSA, “Trigger The Vote.” The hope is that we all will register to vote and clean up Washington from one side of Pennsylvania Avenue to the other. You can check it out on YouTube, under the title “Tough Like Chuck Norris,” or go to http://www.TriggerTheVote.org.)
Tax Blunder Rebellion: Experts Urge 1.4m NOT to Pay Up For the Taxman’s Mistake
Around 1.4million Britons are being urged to stage an unprecedented revolt over plans to claw back up to £3.8billion in under-paid tax.
It follows the botched introduction of a new computer system by the taxman which has left millions of bills in chaos.
The first batch of 45,000 letters demanding cash to be repaid will start to arrive on Tuesday – with the rest sent out over the next four months.
But accountants said recipients should act swiftly to use a little-known loophole which forces HM Revenue and Customs to abandon ‘out of the blue’ demands and effectively write off the money.’
