California Cops Taser Senior Citizen in His Own Home
In America, now officially a police state, you will be tasered in your own home if you lip off to the police.
Senior citizen Peter McFarland of Marin County, California, discovered this after he fell down the stairs outside his home last year. On June 29, 2009, McFarland tumbled down the stairs and after his wife called paramedics the cops showed up. They entered McFarland’s home and tasered him because they claimed he was suicidal.
“We want to take you to the hospital for an evaluation, you said if you had a gun, you’d shoot yourself in the head,” a deputy can be heard saying on a video of the incident captured on a taser mounted camera. McFarland said the comment was hyperbole made because he was in pain.
“Stand up, put your hands behind your back or you’re going to be tased,” the deputy commanded. McFarland refused, told the police in no uncertain terms to get out of his house, so the cop tased him not once, but three times, as his wife looked on in horror and pleaded with the cops to stop because her husband has a heart condition.’
Canadian Family Destroyed in Government Sex Abuse Cover-up
The above video was made by the wife of Wayne H Ackerman, of Canada. She was a German National that married Wayne, and should be entitled to all of the rights of Canadian citizenship. Instead, she, her husband, and her two children are literally fighting for their very lives.
Wayne is a “persona non-grata” in Canada for filing charges against the “Crown” that involved the frequent sexual and physical abuse he suffered after being admitted to Pine Ridge and Brookside Training schools.
According to the Court Affidavit, Wayne was sexually abused at Pine Ridge by 5 different male staff members, including the Headmaster, on 30 separate occasions. He was also physically abused by staff at both schools. One of the beatings he endured broke his ribs, gave him two black eyes and other injuries. One of the staff members would “shock” Wayne using a cord plugged into an electrical outlet.
Wayne was raped, exposed to pornography, forced to sexually abuse others, and given alcohol. Pornographic pictures were also taken by the staff. He was repeatedly warned not to tell anyone, not even his parents, if he wanted to stay alive.’
Alcohol ID Checks ‘Infantilising’ Young Adults, Says Survey
Constant ID checks in supermarkets and off-licences are “infantilising” young adults and confusing shoppers about legal age limits, a report by a civil liberties group claims today.
The survey by the Manifesto Club suggests that cashiers’ over-zealous questioning of customers in their 20s is “penalising thousands of innocent” people and forcing them to carry their passports all the time.
The study, 28¾: How Constant Age Checks Are Infantilising Adults, is published as the coalition government is considering increasing to £20,000 the maximum penalty for those illegally serving underage drinkers .’
Did the Rothschild’s Buy the Mormon Church?
Startling new claims are coming out about the Rothschild relationship with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. According to one Steve Davis, whose father was the highest ranking Mason in Utah, and an employee of the Rothschilds, the Church was suckered into buying $500 million dollars of worthless “swamp land” by two of its Counselors in the early 1960s. Davis claims that the Church lien that resulted gave the Rockefeller family control over all Church assets, including Temple Square through Chase Manhattan Bank.
Apparently, Swiss Billionaire Robert Vincent de Oliverri, the second richest Rothschild in the world at the time, joined the LDS faith after two missionaries knocked on his door. The Illuminati will often join Churches and other organizations to move them into their globalist agenda. In what appears to be a “hand-off” from the Rockefellers to the Rothschilds, Oliverri flew into Salt Lake City and wrote a $500 million dollar check to pay off the Rockefeller lien.’
Meltdown of the Climate ‘Consensus’
If this keeps up, no one’s going to trust any scientists.
The global-warming establishment took a body blow this week, as the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change received a stunning rebuke from a top-notch independent investigation.
For two decades, the IPCC has spearheaded efforts to convince the world’s governments that man-made carbon emissions pose a threat to the global temperature equilibrium — and to civilization itself. IPCC reports, collated from the work of hundreds of climate scientists and bureaucrats, are widely cited as evidence for the urgent need for drastic action to “save the planet.”
But the prestigious InterAcademy Council, an independent association of “the best scientists and engineers worldwide” (as the group’s own Web site puts it) formed in 2000 to give “high-quality advice to international bodies,” has finished a thorough review of IPCC practices — and found them badly wanting.’
Blood on Our Farms: Is Monsanto Responsible for One Suicide Every 30 Minutes?
India is in the midst of a flood of suicides among farmers. A new feature film written and directed by Anusha Rizwi and produced by Bollywood megastar Aamir Khan, called Peepli Live, takes a look at this grim topic.
The vast majority of people in India still farm for a living, but are caught between deep debt and the erratic nature of seasonal change.
Indian farmers are pressured into mortgaging their farms to purchase genetically modified seeds, pesticides, and fertilizer from American companies like Monsanto.’
Park51 and the Charge of “Islamophobia”
The recent and growing controversy over the plan to build a thirteen-storey mosque near Ground Zero has, once again, concentrated public attention on the fact and nature of Islam. Is it, as its adherents claim, a “religion of peace,” a bringer of benefits to mankind, a harbinger of a better world, a faith which, according to President Obama, accentuates “the dignity of all human beings”? Or, on the contrary, is it something entirely different, not so much a religion as a political ideology grounded in an incendiary and hortative arsenal of texts, primarily the Koran but also the hadith, the sirah and the theological ruminations of Islamic thinkers and jurists from earliest times to the present? Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, the moving force behind the Park51 mosque, assures us that Islam is not something to be feared but to be welcomed. Moreover, it is not Islam or even al-Qaeda that is the major fomenter of violence and upheaval in the world but—you guessed it—the United States. The United States, according to Rauf, is responsible for the deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children. America “has more Muslim blood on its hands than al-Qaida has on its hands of innocent non-Muslims.” As for the plague of suicide bombers indiscriminately spilling unoffending blood, this apparently has nothing to do with Islam as such, or the Koranic injunctions to “slay and be slain” (Surah 9:111) and to “slay the idolaters wherever you find them” (Surah 9:5), among innumerable other sanguinary commands. Rather, suicide bombers are justifiably motivated by “political reasons…and worldly objectives.”
The imam’s wife, Daisy Khan, is equally certain that the United States is an Islamophobic country. Indeed, she feels prompted to add, somewhat redundantly, that “It is not even Islamophobia, it’s beyond Islamophobia—it’s hate of Muslims.” TIME magazine has recently distinguished itself with a truly abject and defamatory article confirming Ms. Khan’s hypothesis, opining that “it is plain that many of Park51’s opponents are motivated by deep-seated Islamophobia.”
The unadulterated nonsense and shameless calumnies such people traffic in should be exposed for what they are: a furtive and determined campaign to introduce Islamic canons and “universals”, including shari’a law, into the very matrix of Western societies, with a view to eventually subverting them. (Islamic proponents know very well what they are doing; their Western apologists are, for the most, merely ignorant and self-deluded in providing a laissez-passer.) European countries, such as France, Holland, Sweden and especially Britain, are already stricken by galloping Islamicism—or, more accurately, are largely incapable of responding to the advancing menace. In fact, they are abetting it, both at home and abroad. One of the more piquant instances of compliance involves the $1 million the Dutch government has apparently earmarked as a donation to the Park51 project.
The Ground Zero mosque has become the focal point of the great debate that has galvanized the country for many years now. It is framed as a conflict between those who believe the site is hallowed ground that should be dedicated to the memory of the thousands who perished there, and those who stand behind the multicultural mantra of religious tolerance for all, including for those who are themselves intolerant or cleave to a patently supremacist ideology that has America’s demise at heart. The larger issue, then, has to do with the concept of “tolerance, “which is understood as embracing all forms of political ideologies without demanding reciprocity from the beneficiaries of such largesse—a dangerous inanity that author Howard Rotberg in a recent book has labelled “Tolerism”—is both preposterous and suicidal. The stretching of the First Amendment to serve as an umbrella for a religious faith that advocates the reduction and even in some cases the extinction of all its competitors, as well as the submission of all non-Muslims to an imperial Caliphate, and that furnishes its adherents with the doctrinal weapons to carry out the program, is a perversion of thought. We have been spoiled, it seems, by too many years of unlimited credit, not only fiscally but in the realm of untenable ideas.
The cerebral virus penetrates everywhere. Thus the argument floated by supporters of the Manhattan mosque that the controversy is a local issue, an exclusively New York concern, and that the rest of America should butt out—when it is obvious that the spread of Islamic propaganda under cover of a threadbare canopy of charity and compassion is a question of national import. We should be able to see through the “Mosquerade,” to quote Montreal writer Mark Lepage, but many of us are blinded by our own self-regard as the most enlightened of citizens. As polarizing and critical as the current affray may be, we fail to understand that Park51 is conceived as merely one more room in the House of Islam, though one of its most elegantly appointed.
This why you ask questions-this is why you don’t blindly accept!
Jihad Watch
Rauf’s tax-exempt mosque on W. 85th Street in Manhattan doesn’t exist
More duplicity and deception from this vaunted “moderate.” “Questions Raised About Rauf’s Nonexistent Mosque,” from IPT News, September 1:
The federal government considers the Muslim group founded by Ground Zero Mosque leader Feisal Abdul Rauf to be a tax-exempt church. But federal records show the group obtained that status by claiming to hold prayer services for up to 500 people in a Manhattan apartment building that has no space to hold that many people. The application for tax exempt status from the American Sufi Muslim Association (ASMA) in 1998 claimed the group had an established place of worship at 201 W. 85th St. in New York. That is a 17-floor apartment building.
The 1998 tax filing, called a 1023 form, is required for any institution that wants to be considered a religious house of worship and therefore exempt from taxation. In the filing, Rauf is identified as ASMA’s founder. The application said the group was already operating as a prayer center for between 450 and 500 daily worshipers.
However, a review of the building and real estate records indicates there is nowhere in the building to house that many congregants. ASMA lists its office address as 201 W. 85th St., Apt. 10E on the tax form, while it cites only the building address as its location for prayer services.
The building has apartments only and no public spaces, such as a conference or a board room, to accommodate 450 people. Apartment 10E, building records show, is a one-bedroom apartment with about 800 square feet of living space. In the 1997 incorporation records filed with the state of New York, Rauf’s wife, Daisy Khan, was named as an ASMA director living at that address.
But when ASMA filed for its church status with the IRS, Khan was no longer listed as a director. Instead, Rauf signed the form that said ASMA’s address was the same as Khan’s apartment – 201 W. 85th St., Apt. 10E.
Rauf was traveling in the Middle East on a State Department-sponsored tour and could not be reached for comment. In an email late Wednesday, Khan claimed the IPT story was inaccurate, but did not specify what she thought was wrong:
“I have received your enquiry, and notice that it includes inaccurate and outdated information. Unfortunately, as I’m sure you can appreciate, we are extremely busy right now and will not be able to provide you with answers by the time of your deadline. I look forward to communicating with you in the future, so that all the facts can be known.”
Khan did not respond to a subsequent telephone call seeking details of what she thought was inaccurate.
Since ASMA’s creation in 1997, its organizers have listed three separate addresses in their filings with state and local governments, records show.
When Rauf and Khan first filed their incorporation papers with the state of New York in July 1997, the group was called the American Sufi Muslim Association (ASMA). Its address was 227 78th St., North Bergen, N.J. That was Rauf’s home…
Read more at: http://www.investigativeproject.org/2150/questions-raised-about-raufs-nonexistent-mosque
